9/11 - Die Frage nach den Tätern - Was wußte George W. Bush?
Guilty for 9-11 - Bush in the Open - Schuldig für den 11. September - Bush auf freier Flur
Artikel von Illarion Bykov und Jared Israel vom 18.1.2002

Der Artikel leitet her, daß US-Präsident Bush davon gewußt haben muß, was in Zusammenhang mit den Anschlägen geplant gewesen ist und was nicht. Obwohl die erste Maschine bereits im WTC eingeschlagen war und er dies erfahren haben mußte, habe er sich von seinem Hotel aus - entgegen aller üblichen Sicherheitsregeln - zu dem vorgesehenen Besuch einer Schule auf den Weg gemacht. Dabei sei öffentlich bekannt gewesen, daß und wann er sich in der Schule aufhalten würde. Daß er den Besuch trotzdem durchgeführt hat, sei nur erklärbar, wenn man davon ausgeht, daß er sicher war, daß sich die terroristischen Angriffe mit Sicherheit nicht auf ihn richten würden.

We have demonstrated that normal air safety and air defense measures were not employed on September 11th. This is extraordinary because 9-11 was the only day that four airplanes were hijacked in the U.S., not to mention the only day that three planes crashed into key buildings in New York City and Washington, DC. (1)

We have argued that this stand-down of the air protection systems could not have occurred absent the involvement of top officials. We have named George Walker Bush, Donald Rumsfeld and General Richard B. Myers.

Why these three men?

Authority in the U.S. military stems from a person's position in the military chain-of-command. The President and the Secretary of Defense are the two top positions in the military chain-of-command. The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff is part of the communications chain and can be given specific responsibilities by the President and/or Secretary of Defense. (1a) On 11 September, George Bush was President. Donald Rumsfeld was Secretary of Defense. And General Richard B. Myers was Acting Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

These three men had critical responsibilities for the protection of New York and Washington, DC that day. According to the information which is publicly available, they shirked their duties.

Their behavior, as described in the media, presents the appearance of bewilderment, naiveté and lack of preparedness. But we shall prove this appearance was contrived.

Let us begin at the top of the chain-of-command.


On 9-11 President Bush was in Sarasota, Florida on the second day of a two-day tour. Bush's plans for that day were publicly known in advance. (2)

Many people are confused concerning what President Bush knew and when he knew it that morning.

The reason for this confusion is that, later on, Ari Fleischer, Bush's press secretary, Richard Cheney, his Vice President and President Bush himself issued contradictory accounts of what Bush did that morning.

Fortunately, newspaper and TV people were with President Bush in Florida on September 11. Their eyewitness reports paint a clear picture.

In this section of the Summary of Evidence, we will:

* a) establish what Bush and his staff knew prior to his entering the classroom at the Booker School and

* b) consider some implications.

In future sections we will examine Bush's actual visit to the Booker School and his departure from Sarasota-Bradenton International Airport in Florida later that morning. We will also examine the cover stories floated, later on, by Fleischer, Cheney and by President Bush himself.


Associated Press reporter Sonya Ross was one of the journalists covering Bush's trip to Florida on the morning of 9-11. Ms. Ross was either on her way to the Booker School or already there when she learned of the first WTC crash:

"My cell phone rang as President Bush's motorcade coursed toward Emma E. Booker Elementary School in Sarasota, Fla. A colleague reported that a plane had crashed into the World Trade Center in New York. No further information.

"I called the AP desk in Washington, seeking details. Same scant information. But I knew it had to be grim. I searched for a White House official to question, but none was on hand until 9:05 a.m. " AP 12 September (3)

Ms. Ross 'searched for a White House official' because she knew Bush's people would be better informed than the Associated Press.


President Bush is not an ordinary person. He travels with an entire staff. They are responsible for receiving, filtering and conveying administrative and military information. Chief of Staff Andrew Card organizes and coordinates these staff members and communicates with the President. In addition, Bush has the Secret Service, which is responsible for his safety.

The members of this support team have the best communications equipment in the world. They maintain contact with, or can easily reach, Bush's cabinet, the National Military Command Center (NMCC) in the Pentagon, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), and Secret Service agents who have stayed behind at the White House, etc.

Since Ms. Ross heard about the first WTC crash while the Bush motorcade was speeding to the Booker School, common sense dictates that Mr. Bush knew earlier and knew more.

ABC journalist John Cochran was traveling with the President. He reported on this very matter on ABC TV on Tuesday morning:

"Peter, as you know, the president's down in Florida talking about education. He got out of his hotel suite this morning, was about to leave, reporters saw the White House chief of staff, Andy Card, whisper into his ear. The reporter said to the president, 'Do you know what's going on in New York?' He said he did, and he said he will have something about it later. His first event is about half an hour at an elementary school in Sarasota, Florida." 'ABC News' Special Report (4)

So Bush knew about the first WTC incident before leaving his hotel.

What else did he know?

1) John Cochran reports that President Bush did not respond to Andrew Card. It is inconceivable that a living person could be told that a plane had just ploughed into the biggest building in New York and have no response. So Bush must have known before Card whispered in his ear.

2) This is confirmed by the fact that shortly after Card spoke to him, Bush told a reporter that he would make a statement later. Bush would not have said that without discussing the situation with his Chief of Staff and others.


This question is answered by something Vice President Richard Cheney revealed, probably unwittingly, on MEET THE PRESS, Sunday, September 16th.

Even without John Cochran's report on ABC, Cheney's comments constitute evidence that before President Bush went to the Booker School he knew a plane had been hijacked and then crashed into the WTC.

Cheney was talking with MEET THE PRESS journalist Tim Russert about the flight path of American Flight 77, which struck the Pentagon. Here's the exchange:

"VICE PRES. CHENEY: ...As best we can tell, they [American Flight 77] came initially at the White House and...

"MR. RUSSERT: The plane actually circled the White House?

"VICE PRES. CHENEY: Didn't circle it, but was headed on a track into it. The Secret Service has an arrangement with the F.A.A. They had open lines after the World Trade Center was... "

"MR. RUSSERT: Tracking it by radar.

"VICE PRES. CHENEY: And when it entered the danger zone and looked like it was headed for the White House was when they grabbed me and evacuated me to the basement... (Etc.)" MEET THE PRESS Transcript (5)

It appears that Cheney may have blurted out the crucial fact that the Secret Service had an open line to the FAA, then realized he was talking too much and stopped before completing his sentence. But if he did indeed talk too much, he also stopped talking too late. It is obvious that the sentence should have ended with the word 'hit' or something similar. Thus:

"The Secret Service has an arrangement with the F.A.A. They had open lines after the World Trade Center was hit."

The Secret Service had a special connection with the FAA so that it could rapidly access information relevant to the President's safety. After the first WTC attack, the connection between the FAA and the Secret Service was elevated to the level of open lines.

(In a similar fashion, orders issued by the FAA and the Joint Chiefs of Staff require heightened contact between the FAA and the National Military Command Center (NMCC) during hijackings. See 'Guilty for 9-11, Section 2: Cheney's Cover Story ') (6)

Therefore, by the time American Flight 11 crashed into the World Trade Center, around 8:46, and most likely before that happened, the Secret Service knew what the FAA knew.

So, what did the FAA know?

The FAA admits that at 8:20 it 'suspected' that American Flight 11 had been hijacked. (7) And according to the official story released Sept. 14th:

"8:40 [the] FAA notifie[s] NEADS (the Northeast Air Defense Sector) of NORAD, the military's civil defense system, about Flight 11, [i.e., that it had been hijacked.]" Newsday 23 September 2001 (7)

Therefore, based on the official story, the Secret Service knew by 8:40 or before that Flight 11 had been hijacked. And since the FAA was tracking Flight 11, as was the National Military Command Center, which is notified of hijackings and has access to radar from all over the country, (8) it is definite that at 8:46 the Secret Service knew a hijacked plane had crashed into the World Trade Center.

So according to the official story, before the President entered the Booker School, indeed, apparently before he left his hotel, the Secret Service knew that, for the first time in US history, the country had been attacked by terrorists from the air.

The job of the Secret Service is to protect the President and Vice President. Here's how Richard Cheney described the response of Secret Service agents when they thought he might be in danger:

"...under these circumstances, they just move. They don't say "sir" or ask politely. They came in and said, "Sir, we have to leave immediately," and grabbed me and...

"MR. RUSSERT: Literally grabbed you and moved you?

"VICE PRES. CHENEY: Yeah. And, you know, your feet touch the floor periodically. But they're bigger than I am, and they hoisted me up and moved me very rapidly down the hallway, down some stairs, through some doors and down some more stairs into an underground facility under the White House, and, as a matter of fact, it's a corridor, locked at both ends..."

NBC MEET THE PRESS 16 September 2001 (9)

Here is what we can state with certainty:

1) Before President Bush left his hotel, the Secret Service knew a hijacked plane had ploughed into the World Trade Center, a building that symbolized US power.

2) The President is the most obvious individual target for a terrorist attack.

3) The President was scheduled to visit the Booker School that morning. The visit was of no importance - that is, he could easily cancel it. His schedule was publicly known, down to the time he would give a talk at the school - 9:30. (10)

4) Assuming the official story was entirely true, there was every reason to believe that a terrorist had flown a plane into the WTC. Therefore, of course, a terrorist might fly a plane into the Booker School to kill Bush - arguably a bigger victory than ramming the WTC. And if the WTC attack signaled the start of a broader terrorist attack, it was certainly possible that heavily armed terrorists would attack the Booker School on the ground.


Given the Secret Service's obligation to protect the President;

Given the Secret Service's open line to the FAA and therefore its knowledge that a plane had been hijacked and subsequently ploughed into the World Trade Center;

Given the potentially deadly threat to President Bush if he proceeded to a public place, on schedule, as announced the day before and known to everyone in the region;

There is only one explanation for the Secret Service allowing President Bush to take the deadly risk of going to the Booker School on the morning of September 11th.

George Walker Bush knew the plans for 9-11. And because he knew those plans, he knew that nobody was going to attack the Booker School.


1) The stand-down of U.S. forces on 9-11 was first documented in Section 1: 'Guilty for 9-11: Bush, Rumsfeld, Myers, Section 1: Why Were None of the Hijacked Planes Intercepted?' [Posted 14 November 2001]
It can be read at http://emperors-clothes.com/indict/indict-1.htm
For links to many Emperor's Clothes articles on 9-11, please go to: http://emperors-clothes.com/indict/911page.htm
Alternative address is http://emperor.vwh.net/indict/911page.htm

1a) See 'CHAIN OF COMMAND of the U.S. MILITARY' which can be read at http://emperors-clothes.com/9-11backups/chainof.htm

2) Regarding public knowledge of Bush's plans for 9-11, See Sarasota Herald-Tribune, September 11, 2001 Tuesday All Editions - Pg. A10 [HEADLINE:] 'Lessons for the president; In visit to Sarasota school, he should look beyond the photo-op' can be read at http://emperors-clothes.com/9-11backups/sarasota.htm#a

3) The Associated Press Wednesday 12 September 2001 "Flying with President Bush on a day terrorists hit hard" by Sonya Ross. For link to exact quote, in context, go to: http://emperors-clothes.com/9-11backups/ap912.htm#quote)

4) ABC News Special Report 'Planes crash into World Trade Center' (8:53 AM ET) Tuesday 11 September 2001. For link to exact quote, in context, go to http://emperors-clothes.com/9-11backups/abc911.htm#mybust

5) For link to exact quote, in context, go to 'NBC, Meet the Press' (10:00 AM ET) Sunday 16 September 2001. http://emperors-clothes.com/9-11backups/nbcmp.htm#openlines
Original transcript of MEET THE PRESS can be read at: http://stacks.msnbc.com/news/629714.asp?cp1=1 )

6) To go direct to reference to FAA, NORAD NMCC communications during hijackings, see 'Guilty for 9-11, Section 2: Mr. Cheney's Cover Story'' [Posted 20 November 2001] http://emperors-clothes.com/indict/indict-2.htm#a

7) Newsday 23 September 2001, 'Air Attack on Pentagon Indicates Weaknesses' by Sylvia Adcock, Brian Donovan and Craig Gordon. For link to references go to http://emperors-clothes.com/9-11backups/nd923.htm#faa840norad
Original at: http://www.newsday.com/ny-uspent232380681sep23.story

8) Regarding the NMCC's access to radar all over the U.S., see 'Guilty for 9-11, Section 2: Mr. Cheney's Cover Story'' [Posted 20 November 2001] http://emperors-clothes.com/indict/indict-2.htm#b

9) For link to exact excerpt, in context, go to http://emperors-clothes.com/9-11backups/nbcmp.htm#grabdick
original at: http://stacks.msnbc.com/news/629714.asp?cp1=1 )

10) FEDERAL NEWS SERVICE ADVANCE SCHEDULE FOR TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, 2001 For FNS report that it will be taping President Bush at 9:30 at the Booker School, go to http://emperors-clothes.com/9-11backups/fns930.htm

Quelle: http://emperors-clothes.com/indict/indict-3.htm

Weiterer Beitrag zur Frage 'Was wußte George W. Bush?':
Was sah Bush?
Dr. Ralph Kutza über die eigenartigen Erinnerungen des US-Präsidenten an den Morgen des 11. September 2001

Alle Beiträge zur Frage 'Was wußte George W. Bush?':
Was verrät die Mimik von Präsident Bush?
Fernsehaufzeichnung 11.9.2001, 09:05 Uhr - Reaktion von Präsident Bush auf die Mitteilung, ein zweites Flugzeug sei ins WTC eingeschlagen
Sagt George W. Bush die Wahrheit?
US-Präsident Bush erklärt, er habe vor Betreten des Klassenraums (also vor 9 Uhr) gesehen, wie ein Flugzeug den Turm getroffen habe - Wie läßt sich das erklären?
Was berichten die Medien über die Flüsterszene?
Was erfährt Bush demnach um kurz nach 9 Uhr von Andrew Card?
Hat US-Präsident Bush gewußt, was geplant war?
Aus forum.bild.de - "Kampf dem Terror - Der 11. September und die Folgen"
Guilty for 9-11 - Bush in the Open - Schuldig für den 11. September - Bush auf freier Flur
Artikel von Illarion Bykov und Jared Israel vom 18.1.2002
Was sah Bush?
Dr. Ralph Kutza über die eigenartigen Erinnerungen des US-Präsidenten an den Morgen des 11. September 2001

Alle Beiträge zur Frage, was mit dem WTC geschah:
Was uns die Medien über die Anschläge auf das World Trade Center vermitteln
Wie oft der Nordturm getroffen wurde, wie oft der Südturm und viele andere Fragen
Der 11. September 2001. Bilder zur Meinungsbildung. Augenschein am Tatort.
Ein Versuch von Andreas von Bülow, dem unbefangenen Beobachter eine eigene Beurteilungsgrundlage zu geben, ob die Rechtfertigung eines jahrzehnte dauernden Weltkrieges gegen den muslimischen Terror auf Grund der Ereignisse des 11.9.2001 in sich stimmig ist oder auf einem Lügengespinst aufbaut

Alle Beiträge zur Frage, was am Pentagon geschah:
Der Anschlag auf das Pentagon
Was für ein Objekt flog in das Pentagon? - Zusammenfassung einer Veröffentlichung von Thierry Meyssan auf der französisch-sprachigen Website 'www.asile.org'
Über Verschwörungstheoretiker und die, die alles besser wissen
Was Spiegel-Online am 10.4.2002 über die Betrachtungen von Thierry Meyssan schreibt und einige Anmerkungen dazu
Aufnahmen vom Anschlag auf das Pentagon
Woher stammen die Aufnahmen und was könnten sie besagen?
Pulverisieren, Verdampfen und Durchbohren
Betrachtungen eines Physikers zu den Vorgängen, die am 11.9.2001 am Pentagon stattgefunden haben sollen - Aus einem Beitrag von 'kritiker20' zum Forum 'http://www.heise.de/tp/foren' vom 1.9.2003
Exklusive Gesellschaft
Hinweis auf die Insassen, die bei AA77 dabeigewesen sein sollen - Beitrag von 'Jonny' zum Forum 'http://www.phoenix.de/forum' vom 24.8.2003
Im Loch verschwunden
"Fotoanalysen zur Erklärung, warum keine boeing 757 ins Pentagon geflogen sein kann" - Betrachtung zum Anschlag auf das Pentagon - angeregt durch einen Beitrag von 'steve' vom 4.8.2003 im Forum 'http://www.heise.de/tp/foren'

Alle Beiträge zur Frage nach den Tätern im Überblick:
Tagebuch 9/11
Notizen zum 11. September 2001 und den Anstrengungen zu seiner Aufklärung
Noch am Tag der Tat steht der Täter fest
Was uns über die Medien suggeriert werden soll - Ein Beispiel: 'Express' vom 12. September 2001
Einige offene Fragen
Artikel von Clara Thümmler in 'Ossietzky' Nr. 19 vom 22.09.2001
Reichstagsbrandstiftung in New York
Artkel von Boris Kagarlitzky in 'junge Welt' vom 24.9.2001
Ist die Kriegsgeilheit größer als der Wunsch nach Wahrheit?
Eine Betrachtung von Regina Schwarz vom 3.10.2001
Weitere offene Fragen
Artikel von Clara Thümmler in 'Ossietzky' Nr. 20 vom 6.10.2001
Insiderhandel - Wußten Investoren vor den Anschlägen Bescheid?
Artikel von Barry Grey in 'junge Welt' vom 16.10.2001
Pentagon-Dementis geplatzt - Selbstmordpiloten ... vom US-Militär ausgebildet
Artikel von Rainer Rupp in 'junge Welt' vom 19.10.2001
Terrorangriffe oder gut geplante geheimdienst-militärische Luftangriffe?
Offene Fragen und andere Merkwürdigkeiten - Ausführungen von Cora Simon vom 3.11.2001
Wenn CIA und die Regierung nicht in die Anschläge vom 11. September verwickelt wären: was würden sie tun?
Artikel von Michael C. Ruppert vom 2.11.2001 in 'From The Wilderness Publications'
Immer noch offene Fragen
Artikel von Clara Thümmler in 'Ossietzky' Nr. 22 vom 3.11.2001
Bin Laden und die CIA
Artikel von Alexandra Bader vom 5.11.2001 im Frauen-Online-Magazin CeiberWeiber
Anschläge in Amerika und Krieg in Afghanistan
Ausführungen von Daniel Schulz über Tat und Täter vom 12.11.2001
Fragen, Antworten, neue Fragen
Aus einem Artikel von Clara Thümmler in 'Ossietzky' Nr. 23 vom 17.11.2001
"Amerikaner bis zur Tat völlig ahnungslos"
Andreas von Bülow (SPD), ehem. Bundesminister, in 'Konkret' 12/2001
Geheime Wurzeln des Krieges
Artikel von Mumia Abu-Jamal in 'junge Welt' vom 29.12.2001
"Da sind Spuren wie von einer trampelnden Elefantenherde"
Andreas von Bülow (SPD), ehem. Bundesminister, im 'Tagesspiegel' vom 13.1.2002
"Die amerikanische Darstellung ist falsch - 7 der 19 Attentäter haben nach dem 11. September noch gelebt"
Andreas von Bülow (SPD), ehem. Bundesminister, in 'Oberhessische Presse' vom 5.4.2002
Fragen & Widersprüche zum 11. September
Artikel von Rainer Rupp, 25.6.2002
Was weiß Rumsfeld über den 11. September?
Andreas von Bülow (SPD), ehem. Bundesminister, in 'junge Welt' vom 8.2.2003
"Ich glaub nicht an den Klapperstorch"
Andreas von Bülow (SPD), ehem. Bundesminister, in der 'Frankfurter Rundschau' vom 23.8.2003
Heiße Fragen zum 11. September - Britischer Ex-Minister bezweifelt offizielle Version
Artikel von Rainer Rupp vom 10.9.2003
Internationaler Terrorismus: Mischten USA in Beslan mit?
Andreas von Bülow (SPD), ehem. Bundesminister, in 'junge Welt' vom 11.9.2003
Bin Laden nicht wegen 11. September gesucht
Eine Veröffentlichung der 'Süddeutschen Zeitung' vom 9.5.2006
"Die größten betrügerischen Akte in unserer Geschichte als Vorwand für einen Krieg gegen den Terror inszeniert"
Ein Leserbrief von Lauro Chavez zum 11. September 2001
Wer darf behaupten: Der Holocaust hat nie stattgefunden
Betrachtungen zu Horst Mahler und Eric Hufschmid, 27.11.2006
Ablenken, verwirren, tabuisieren, stigmatisieren
Pod, Flash und Pentagon - Betrachtung über Desinformationsstrategien in der 9/11-Aufklärungsbewegung und die Beweiskraft der Bilder, 9.1.2007
BBC-Meldung über den Einsturz von WTC7 vor dem Einsturz
Artikel von Gerhard Wisnewski, BBC-Stellungnahme vom 27.2.2007 und Online-Petition an die BBC
Wer ist der echteste Scheich?
Betrachtung zum Pentagon-Geständnis vom 14.3.2007 mit Äußerungen einer Chalid Scheich Mohammed genannten Person
Der 11.9.2001 im Urteil von Sachverständigen
Ausgewählte Zitate aus der Homepage der Gruppe 'patriots question 9/11' - Zusammenstellung und Übersetzung: Andreas von Bülow
Der 11. September 2001. Bilder zur Meinungsbildung. Augenschein am Tatort.
Ein Versuch von Andreas von Bülow, dem unbefangenen Beobachter eine eigene Beurteilungsgrundlage zu geben, ob die Rechtfertigung eines Jahrzehnte dauernden Weltkrieges gegen den muslimischen Terror auf Grund der Ereignisse des 11.9.2001 in sich stimmig ist oder auf einem Lügengespinst aufbaut
9/11 - Habt Ihr das vielleicht selbst gemacht?
Video und Text des Songs der Hip-Hop- und Rap-Band 'Die Bandbreite'
Blind, taub und stumm
Andreas von Bülow über das Urteil des Oberlandesgerichts Hamburg vom 8.1.2007 gegen den angeblichen Terrorhelfer Mounir El Motassadeq - 20.9.2007
Gegen das Einknicken von Gewerkschaftern vor den Kriegstreibern des 'Spiegel'
Offener Brief von Claudia Karas an den Pressesprecher der IG Metall Bayern, Matthias Jena, 2.12.2007
Operation 9/11: ein Musterbeispiel für synthetischen Terror
Julius Streichers 'Stürmer' ist bescheiden verglichen mit dem heutigen Propagandaapparat gegen den Islam - Elias Davidsson im Interview mit Muslim-Markt am 2.8.2008
Es gibt keine Beweise dafür, dass Muslime am 11. September 2001 Flugzeuge entführten
Analyse von Elias Davidsson vom 10.1.2008
Ruf nach Gerechtigkeit
Gerechtigkeit für die Opfer des 11. September - Gerechtigkeit für Mounir El Motassadeq - Aufruf, initiiert von Elias Davidsson
"Es handelt sich um Anschläge, die von Geheimdiensten begangen wurden."
Interview mit Andreas von Bülow über den 11. September 2001 - veröffentlicht bei telepolis am 11.9.2010
Die Medien müssen sich entschuldigen, daß sie ohne jeden Beweis behauptet haben, Muslime hätten die Anschläge vom 11. September begangen
Aufruf anläßlich des neunten Jahrestages des 11. September 2010
Wenn Hochhäuser in sich zusammenfallen
Rainer Rupp in Ossietzky 4/2011, 18.2.2011
Meine Reaktion zum Tod von Osama Bin Laden
Noam Chomsky am 7.5.2011
Lynchmord Obamas an Osama - Staatsterrorismus versus Privatterrorismus – Terroristen unter sich
Jürgen Rose am 09.05.2011
Osama bin Ladens nützlicher Tod
Paul Craig Roberts, 3.5.2011
Osama und die Geister des 11. September: Der Beweis, dass Obama lügt
Michael C. Ruppert, 7.5.2011
Zur Ermordung von Osama bin Ladens
Kommentar von Elias Davidsson, 3.5.2011
Die Anschläge am 11. September 2001 und die Orwellsche Neudefinition der "Verschwörungstheorie"
Paul Craig Roberts, 20.06.2011
Doch Thermit! - Wissenschaftler weisen Thermit im Staub der 9/11-World-Trade-Center-Katastrophe nach
John S. Hatch, 14.04.2009
False Flag Terror
Anneliese Fikentscher und Andreas Neumann zum 10. Jahrestag des 11. September 2001
Bisher unveröffentlicht
Zwei Leserbriefe von Anneliese Fikentscher und Andreas Neumann zum 10. Jahrestag des 11. September 2001 - 7.9.2011
Nachdenken tabu? - Unsere politische Schlacht gegen die Lüge muss beginnen lang bevor die erste Bombe gefallen ist
Vortrag von George Pumphrey - gehalten am 30.9.2011 in Heidelberg aus Anlass des 10. Jahrestages der Anschläge vom 11. September 2001
Freilassung eines unschuldigen Gefangenen
Aufruf zu Wahrheit und Gerechtigkeit, 24.11.2014